Card numbering system for Oracle decks

Bug reports, feature suggestions etc...

Moderators: Programmer, WebWeaver, WillowsHeart

purple_scorp
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon 19 Sep, 2005 6:05 am

Re: Re: Card numbering system for Oracle decks

Post by purple_scorp »

Hi Richard,

thanks for your reply. I don't mind creating the dummy 00 card but what do you do with it when it shows up in one of your readings??? Do you just draw another card from the pack to replace it?

I'm not a programmer, just a crazy person who dreams up ideas to test the programmer's skills, lol!
But, would it be possible to have the 00 card (as a dummy card) but to exclude it from the reading? (Like having a tick box on the deck options table that we could tick/untick for each deck to state whether or not we wanted the 00 card to be included in the pack for readings)? Would that make it less buggy?

I wrote in the other thread (Oracle and multiple backs) regarding having the ability for sub-categories (Majors, Minors, Courts etc) which I believe would be a really beneficial function.

Regards
purple_scorp
Christine
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat 01 Jan, 2005 12:00 am

Re: Re: Card numbering system for Oracle decks

Post by Christine »

Hi Richard!

Zero is where you still have your shoes on . . . .-) Actually, zero is profound. I remember way back when I was teaching alternative number bases to gifted seventh graders. Base two. . . .remember that? Then on to base eight, and on to 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024. . . sound familiar? Anyhow, using zero is simply a mind-set, base ten - ten symbols 0 - 9. Don't change a thing! I LIKE taking my shoes off!

Many Blessings,

Christine
User avatar
Programmer
Major Contributor
Major Contributor
Posts: 1725
Joined: Sat 01 Jan, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Spain
Contact:

Re: Re: Re: Card numbering system for Oracle decks

Post by Programmer »

Hi Christine,

If you take a look at the beta you will see I included the number ten in the menu icon (I was going to include a couple of footprints but I thought some users might find that confusing)!

Richard
Post Reply