Standard Numbering System
Posted: Sun 20 Nov, 2005 5:44 pm
I know I number my cards different then most. However if we are indeed moving toward sharing spreads with each other, we will need to make sure we are using a standard numbering system. I couldn't find where this had been discussed for a suggested numbering of the cards. Something that might be suggested prior to uploading a deck, and something we would know was the standard for Orphalese, so that if and when we are sharing spreads we know we are seeing the cards we are suppose to. I currently number Majors, Cups Ace-King, Wands Ace-King, Pentacles Ace-King, Swords Ace-King. It might be better to assign the numbering based on the elements so a deck is element specific verses suit names. Oracles which was recently discussed are an animal in and of themselves. However... oracles are not interchangeable like Tarot decks are. However it may be something that should be discussed. Maybe they should be number as they are listed in the book that comes with the deck? They are not interchangeable like Tarot decks are so it will just be a matter of standardization.
Again maybe this is something that has already been settled. I don't have a problem chainging how I number to use this program because it's well worth it. I just want to know if there is a standard and what it is.
Thanks,
Shari
Again maybe this is something that has already been settled. I don't have a problem chainging how I number to use this program because it's well worth it. I just want to know if there is a standard and what it is.
Thanks,
Shari